《西雅图夜未眠》CoCoM

45、法院文件-反驳他出庭前的恶毒诡辩

　　Page 3

　　14)MAY 2, she took photos from his neighborhood and use his dog’s pic as her profile photo.
　　Response from Respondent:
　　1)Repeat this again as mentioned this in “Page 1 point 6, a, b”
　　2)May 1, not May 2.
　　3)I took photos, as I found the view beautiful. I have freedom to take photos.(See Respondent Declaration & Jacobson Declaration, see Exhibit 24)
　　4)The fact is that: I meant to say farewell for my internal closure of the relationship, it’s only about myself, nothing about him. (See Exhibit 23, 24)
　　5)The picture of the dog is published by Petitioner on social media Weibo in 2020. it’s a public picture. (See Exhibit 29)
　　6)I used the picture on 04/23/2023. nothing to do with 05/01/2023.
　　7)I didn’t disclose his ID when I used this picture. I intentionally cut off the part includes his ID to protect his privacy. (See Exhibit 30)
　　8)On 04/24/2023, when Petitioner called me, he said “ can you hide yous post with profile picture of the dog?” He knew about the picture, he didn’t request me to remove it, but only waited till 05/16/2023, he requested in his petition for protection order. Actually I removed it soon.

　　For below points 15-21, See Exhibit 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, the statistics and the content of my contact. As a woman who was deceived and manipulated in the past 7 years, as promised by petitioner that “I could bring any demands”, that he plans to “continuously apologize to me and listen to my demands” (See complete conversation history in Exhibit 31), all of my legitimate purpose to contact him is to seek for explanation, closure, compensation as he promised.
　　There was only one day, on 05/15/2023, I called him over 20 times in total. My calls were driven by emotional sadness need for explanations and closure, but they only occurred on that specific day and were limited to a single instance, 1 time in 7-years.

　　15)MAY 14, called 16 times, sent 6 messages, and sent 4 emails to both his personal and working email address that day. (See Exhibit 40)
　　16)MAY 15, called 24 times, sent 42 messages, and sent 2 emails to both his personal and working email address that day. She wanted financial compensation, asking him to answer her calls and messages. (See Exhibit 40)
　　17)MAY 15, she emailed and messaged (tool similar to Zoom-- Chime) at least 10 of his managers and coworkers. She is saying that he is a sexual fraud. She tells them: you are sexual fraud, your behaviors harmed her and Amazon, she wants an apology, she wants loss made up. See the email in Exhibit 8 (page 13).
　　Response from Respondent:
　　1)Repeat this again as mentioned this in “Page 2 point 6, 10
　　2)I only sent 1 email to 5 receipts, plus petitioner himself, withe the same request as on 04/27/2023, fearing that Kang Dai may further defame my reputation, and due to his threats on April 24, 2023 and those online defamation which caused my severe fear, I believed that Kang Dai’s employer as neutral third party, should have the authority to make an internal investigation and reveal the truth. Because he said his colleagues all knew already, and his supervisors are Chinese, and in Chinese culture, manger and employee can manage such topic privately and peacefully. I did not report him to the police as I was hoping to resolve the problems privately and peacefully with Kang Dai. Amazon HR and his surpervisor replied and promised will take care of it. (See Exhibit 45, 31)
　　3)I didn’t say “you are sexual fraud” - didn’t find this in email.
　　4)“your behaviors harmed her” - yes, his behavior harmed me, he hurts me deeply emotionally due to his deception and manipulation in the past 7 years. He hurts me deeply physically due to he had sex with me in my period on 02/10/2023, which caused me physical pain lasted till now. His behaviors caused me may not to have child any more.

　　18)MAY 16,
　　a.She called 2 times, sent 6 messages
　　b.She created a Chime chatting room, named is as “DaiKang-Sexual Fraud”, invited his managers into the room.
　　Response from Respondent:
　　1)Repeat this again as mentioned this in “Page 3 point 17”
　　2)I wondered why he didn’t reply me after read my message, I also wondered if that is his Chime account. So on 05/16/2023, I invited a chatroom with name “DK”. But he stayed in the chatroom. I sent 1 message: “Dai Kang, please don’t avoid the problem.” On 05/17/2023, I added “his managers” to the chatroom. He still didn’t leave the chatroom, or ask me not to do so. I sent 3 messages in chatroom. The chatroom name is still “DK”. On 05/18/2023, I sent a few messages. The name of the chatroom was still “DK”. I don’t remember from what exact time I changed name to “DaiKang-Sexual Fraud” for a few minutes. In total I sent 10 messages with 2 screenshots. After I received and understood the protection order. I removed everyone from the chatroom, and didn’t contact him again. (See Exhibit 40, 47, 31)
　　3) His manger replied. (See Exhibit 47 last screenshot)

　　c.Attempted to connect to his work email address, sent spam calls to the company's Chime account, and attempted to disrupt his work.
　　Response from Respondent:
　　1)Repeat this again as mentioned this in “Page 3 point 17
　　2) He “off work 2 months”- how to disrupt his work?

　　19)MAY 16, she threatened him on her social media, stating, “I need compensation”, "If you don't answer me or come to see me, I will try all means to find people who might know you."
　　Response from Respondent:
　　1)Repeat this again as mentioned this in “Page 1 point 5, d
　　2)Two “May 16”, can organize into one
　　3) No evidence of “threaten”, no intention of “threaten”, this is defamation. See how petitioner threatened me (See Exhibit 31)
　　4)I didn’t say “if you don’t come to see me”, I didn’t say “I will try all means”. This is complete wrong and misleading translation from Chinese to English.
　　5)“I need compensation”, because Petitioner promised me on 04/24/2023, that I “could bring any demand to him” due to his 7 years lies and hurting to me. (See Exhibit 31)

　　20)MAY 17,
　　a.Called 2 times, sent 18 messages
　　b.Sent 10 messages in Chime chatting room. Said same stuff as emails and abused him.
　　Response from Respondent:
　　Repeat this again as mentioned this in “Page 3 point 17

　　21)May 18, called 4 times, sent 22 messages. See all the calls & message motioned above in Exhibit 9 (page 14).
　　Response from Respondent:
　　1)Repeat this again as mentioned this in “Page 3 point 17
　　2)See Exhibit 40 for comprehensive statistics

　　22)May 18, the Anti-harassment Protection Order was delivered to her.
　　Response from Respondent:
　　1)On May 18, 2023, in the afternoon, I received a text message from a police officer, mentioning a civil protection order but did not include any content of the order. At that time, I did not know the meaning of a protection order. I replied police at 5:09PM police about the nature of protection order.
　　2)And after spending whole evening on it, I still didn’t fully understand it, due to my limited experience in America, none experience of law, and language barrier. Police replied me next day but without answering my questions about the order. (See Exhibit 48, 49)
　　3)Therefore, next day on May 19, 2023, I called police to come to my home to help me understand what is protection order and what I should do. I invited police to check my phone and laptop. Two police officers confirmed that I didn’t violate the order. (See Exhibit 50)
　　4)After that, I didn’t contact petitioner any more, as I also didn’t want to contact.

　　23)May 18, she started to VIOLATE the order and disregard the court documents in several ways.
　　Response from Respondent:
　　1)I didn’t violate the order. On May 19, 2023, I called police to come to my home to help me understand what is protection order and what I should do. I invited police to check my phone and laptop. Two police officers confirmed that I didn’t violate the order. (See Exhibit 50)

　　Refuting Page 5 Line 20:

　　24)Respondent admitted to creating a post titled "Move on" and claiming to stop. However, it is important to note that the Respondent included a Google Drive link in that post, which was used to expose the Petitioner's private audio recordings. This action clearly demonstrates that the Respondent did not actually move on but instead started the harassment.
　　See Exhibit 10 (page 43).
　　Response from Respondent:
　　1)Here the statement and “Exhibit 10 (page 43) are totally different stuff. Evidence doesn’t support statement at all.
　　2)Statement Repeated again as already repeated in page 1, 6), a; in page 2, 13), please refer to previous response.
　　3)On 04/24/2023, after I was informed that petitioner lied to me “from beginning to end” in the past 7 years, after he threatened me in various ways, after he used me again, after he promised to “continuously apologize to me and listen to my demands”, after he chose not to fullfill his promise to my either demand “call to apologize” or “compensation”, from 04/24/2023 to 05/01/2023, it indeed took me such a LONG time to MOVE ON, and I still failed to MOVE ON! I so wished that I moved on within ONE DAY on 04/24/2023!
　　4)I so want to move on, but petitioner dragged me to legal matters, no let me move on!
　　5)Why don’t petitioner move on?
　　6)Any one can help me move on quickly? I even prayed for God to help me move on on 04/24/2023. (See Exhibit 51)
　　7)“started harassment” - not true
　　8)On 04/24/2023, after Petitioner called me, I didn’t record the call in the beginning. After he threatened me with his death at around 3AM, which made me very scared. Unknown internet users reminded me to record the call as evidence to protect myself. So I recorded to protect myself. His call was full of blames, threats, leis, begging and manipulation. At that time, I didn’t know that I need his authorization to record, I was too scared and exhausted and just wanted to protect myself. One who hears the call will know how he deceived me, blamed me, threatened me and manipulated me, will understand the entire matter. However, until I hired attorney, I learned that I need opposing party’s authority to record the call in WA. At that time, I just wanted to protect myself. I never experienced this in my life.
　　9)The call/conversation/voice is not private, because when he called me, he was in a hospital - a public place, and there were third parties speaking, for example, his wife spoke with me and helped him lie, there was pass-by’s voices and horn sound.
　　10)Anyone who see this post is not able to listen to it, as it’s just a google link, a very long and complicated link. The conversation is saved in private google link.
　　11)The purpose of the link is to defend myself from countless disgusting defamation on me, as unknown internet users suggested those defamation from Petitioner, Petitioner’s wife or their friends. (See Exhibit 25, 26)
　　12)I told petitioner about the defamation, but he ignored it.
　　13)To protect Petitioner’s privacy, I removed the part that includes/could disclose Petitioner’s personal information including his name. Therefore, it’s only about 1.5 hours, not 3 or 4 hours as he called me. (Petitioner took sexual photo of me without my knowledge and consent!)
　　14)The link doesn’t work well. Another link is blank. (See Exhibit 27)
　　15)The google link of our conversation worked at around noon time on 05/01/2023, a few hours later, I set the permission to private, so no one can listen to it, as I wanted to move on. I also deleted it later. (See Exhibit 28)

　　Page 4

　　Refuting Page 9 Line 4:

　　25)Respondent lied about her violation of the protection order. She said before she was served, she made a post expressing her confusion, shock, and pain. However, in her posts, she was questioning why Petitioner started the protection order against her, which means she obviously got the protection order before the post’s timestamp but still violated them 5 times.
　　Response from Respondent:
　　1)Repeated again as already repeated in page 3, 23)
　　2)I didn’t violate order. (See Exhibit 48, 49, 51)
　　3)I didn’t lie. I didn’t say “She said before she was served, she made a post “, this is this reader’s intentional wrong understanding by picking part of the original content, just like how reflected in other accusations and “evidence”. In the file of “response”, original words are “After Being Served of the Temporary Protection Order, she Has
　　Never Knowingly or Willfully Violated the Order.” “all of her attempts to contact Petitioner were made before she was served of the order and knew of the content and meaning of the order.”

　　a.Contacting him via WeChat message
　　(See response to 15-23, see Exhibit 48,49,51)
　　b.Contacting him via Chime message
　　(See response to 15-23, see Exhibit 48,49,51)
　　c.Contacting the third-parties (Mr Dai’s managers) that might know him
　　(See response to 15-23, see Exhibit 48,49,51)
　　d.Posting the Order and court documents on her social media (Little Red Book, then encouraging people to engage in new internet violence and doxing against Mr. Dai
　　Response from Respondent:
　　1)No evidence of “encouraging people to engage in new internet violence and doxing against Mr. Dai”, already repeated in the paragraph above. No evidence for this. Please refer to the content of my post. (See your own evidence or my Exhibit 53.)
　　2)Post does not include his personal information. Instead, I even marked his information to protect his privacy.
　　3)The post was before I fully understood what is protection order.
　　4)The document is public document.
　　5)I fully respected to court as I attended hearing on site every time, while petitioner and petitioner’s attorney attended online every time and doesn’t want to show face to judge.
　　e.Creating a post on www.1point3acres.com, asking him why he applied for a protection order against her.
　　See Exhibit 11 (page 50).
　　Response from Respondent:
　　1)Here the statement and “Exhibit 11 (page 50) are totally different stuff. Evidence doesn’t support statement at all.
　　2)About the post on point3acres.com. I didn’t mean to “ask him”, I meant to ask myself, ask God, due to everything I suffered from him. See content. (See Exhibit 54)
　　3)The post didn’t include his personal information.
　　4)The post was before I fully understood what is protection order.
　　5)On the same day, at night, I requested the website to delete my post, but not able to do it due to website police - “post will not delete if the post doesn’t contain personal information”. I even reported my own post, and asked people to help me report my post, so it can be closed. (See Exhibit 55)

　　Refuting Page 12 Line 23:

　　26)Respondent lied about her posts. She said she did not mention any name or provide any Petitioner’s personal information nor engage internet violence against Petitioner. However, the fact is:
　　a.She posted two google drive links and two baidu drive links with the Petitioner private information including the name initials and voice record, resulted in 38,480 views and 77 comments. See Exhibit 12 (page 51).
　　Response from Respondent:
　　1)Repeated again as repeated in page 2, 13), a, b; in page 3, 24)
　　2)The link doesn’t include his name or personal information. Evidence doesn’t support.
　　3)No evidence of “engage internet violence against Petitioner”. This is defamation on me.
　　4)The purpose of the link is to defend myself from countless disgusting defamation on me, as unknown internet users suggested those defamation from Petitioner, Petitioner’s wife or their friends. (See Exhibit 25, 26)
　　5)To protect Petitioner’s privacy, I removed the part that includes/could disclose Petitioner’s personal information including his name. Therefore, it’s only about 1.5 hours, not 3 or 4 hours as he called me. (Petitioner took sexual photo of me without my knowledge and consent!)
　　6)The call/conversation/voice is not private, because when he called me, he was in a hospital, and there were third parties speaking, for example, his wife spoke with me and helped him lie, there was pass-by’s voices and horn sound.
　　7)The google link doesn’t work well. Another link is blank. (See Exhibit 27)
　　8)The google link of our conversation was published at around noon time on 05/01/2023, a few hours later, I set the permission to private, so no one can listen to it, as I wanted to move on. I also deleted it later. (See Exhibit 28)
　　9)Two baidu links are blank, and could not open. (See Exhibit 56)
　　10)Therefore, “resulted in” is not true.

　　Refuting Page 13 Line 1:

　　27)Respondent lied about her live streaming actions. She denies these behaviors and said there is no evidence prove the content of live stream nor could prove it ever took place. The fact is that:
　　a.The live stream lasted for 1 hours 45 minutes.
　　b.Later she also uploaded the record of the livestream to her social media. Mr. Dai have the full record of the live stream. See Exhibit 13(page 52).
　　Response from Respondent:
　　1)Same point, repeated 6 times.
　　2)I didn’t try to livestream. I just tried to use Himalaya to convert voice into text, as Himalaya is the only tool I know that could convert voice into text. While trying this function, it was automatically uploaded/“published” before lunch time on 05/18/2023, while I didn’t know. You can check with Himalaya about this function. After I saw it “published”, I immediately deleted it. I deleted before I received the protection order. I have no post/content on Himalaya. (See Exhibit 57)
　　3)I returned the recording to petitioner already.
　　4)Petitioner’s evidence showed that he also recorded my voice without my authorization.

　　Page 5

　　Refuting Page 13 Line 1:

　　28)Respondent said there is no evidence for hate or threat. However, see below evidence:
　　a.In WeChat, she said 12 times “I hate you”.
　　Response from Respondent:
　　1)Please refer to entire conversation on 04/24/2023, especially petitioner’s death threats. (See Exhibit 31)
　　2)On 03/22/2023, due to I suggested breakup, and due to other arguments, Petitioner said “I hate you” to me. I also said it back. After that, petitioner still discussed how to improve our relationship. On 03/26/2023, he said “I tried all means to recover our relationship, and you pushed me away again and again.” On 03/28/2023, he said “I woke up this morning thinking how to improve relationship with you” So please ask petitioner what “I hate you” means to him. (See Exhibit 58)

　　b.For the threat, she said
　　i.“I will get to the major forums and platforms to expose your name directly if I want”
　　Response from Respondent:
　　1)Where is the evidence?
　　2)I didn’t say it.
　　3)Show the complete content. Translate correctly from Chinese to English.
　　ii.“If you don't answer me or come to see me, I will try all means to find people who might know you “
　　Response from Respondent:
　　1)Repeated again as already repeated in 5) d, 19)
　　2)I didn’t say “if you don’t come to see me” or “try all means”, this is intentional wrong translation from Chinese to English to mislead.

　　c.“Your subscribers will be interested in your privacy.” See Exhibit 14 (page 53).
　　Response from Respondent:
　　1)“Exhibit 14 on page 53 doesn’t reflect statement at all.
　　2)I assume you mean the last screenshot on your Exhibit 3, if so, the translation of Chinese means” Pplease solve the problem well, your followers came to contact me and ask about your personal life.” (and I didn’t reply to their question.)

　　Refuting Page 14 Line 1:
　　a.Respondent said she posted her love story only once, however, she posted more than 30 times titled with love story 1 – 26, with at least two separate accounts. See Exhibit 15 (page 54).
　　Response from Respondent:
　　1)“once” means one continuous time, as Little Red Book doesn’t allow me to post all text in one post, so I had to post in multiple times. I had 25 posts with content. Post 26 has no content. Please stop intentional misunderstanding.
　　2)Because my first account was frozen, so I had to use second account.
　　3)It’s my freedom to use my social media accounts to write my story, and it’s anonymous story, with good intention to protect parties’ privacy.

　　Refuting Page 17 Line 14:
　　29)Respondent denied her Stalking or Cyberstalking Petitioner. See the Exhibit 3 (page 9).
　　Response from Respondent:
　　1)Exhibit 3 on page 9 doesn’t show that I “stalk” or “cyberstalking” petitioner.
　　2)Petitioner cyber stalked me with secret accounts on social media. (See Exhibit 59)
　　3)Petitioner sent his followers to cyber stalk me.
　　4)Petitioner sent his followers to cyber stalk me.
　　5)Petitioner used to send me hundreds of messages a day. Petitioner sent me over 700 messages on Skype and WeChat on January 3, 2023; about 200 mesages on March 22, 2023; over 1300 messages in three days from March 26 to March 28, 2023.

　　Refuting Page 19 Line 20:
　　30)Respondent think there is no need to issue a full order give she have posted titled “Move on” on May 1, 2023. However, she still didn’t stop the harassment actions and escalated it after May 14, she even violated the temporary protection order 5 times. So, the Full Order is still required to protect the petitioner and his family.
　　Response from Respondent:
　　1)Excuse me, you want to decide for me when I can move on? Do you pay my medical and therapy cost to help me move on? Have you been deceived and manipulated and hurt for 7 years? Have you been threatened with death? Have you suffered severe depression, anxiety and PTSD? Due to petitioner’s behaviors, I may not be able to have child any more!
　　2)As here you agreed that my post on 05/01/2023 is about “Move On”, why you question me not move on? What is the logic?
　　3)“Post”, “May 14”, “order”, Repeat the same points again and again.
　　4)“harassment” is defamation on me.
　　5)I didn’t violate the order. (See Exhibit 50)
　　6)On 05/01/2023, police told petitioner that my post has no threats. On 05/15/2023, police told petitioner he can block my phone. However, he manipulated me, police, court and judge for his purpose of private revenge.
　　7)Due to all evidence I provided, a full Domestic Violence and anti-harassment Order is required to protect me.